|
|
|
|
2020 Brief No. 59
Agricultural Growth, Poverty Alleviation, and Environmental Sustainability: Having it All
March 1999
|
|
Many developing countries have achieved impressive growth rates in agriculture in recent decades. Asia, for example, was threatened by hunger and mass starvation in the 1960s but is now self-sufficient in staple foods, even though its population has more than doubled. Despite this success, serious concerns remain for the future. Hunger and malnutrition persist in many countries, often because past patterns of agricultural growth were insufficient or failed to adequately benefit the poor. Expected increases in agricultural demand associated with population growth and rising per capita incomes will require continuing increases in agricultural productivity, although evidence indicates that yield growth is slowing and prospects for further expansion of cropped and irrigated areas are limited. And environmental problems associated with agriculture could, if not checked, threaten future levels of agricultural productivity and impose severe health and environmental costs at the national and international levels.
Continued agricultural growth is a necessity, not an option, for most developing countries. But this growth must not jeopardize the underlying natural resource base or impose costly externalities on others. It must also be equitable if it is to help alleviate poverty and food insecurity. These three goals—agricultural growth, poverty alleviation, and environmental sustainability—are not necessarily complementary, and achieving all three simultaneously cannot be taken for granted. Although much depends on the specific social, economic, and agroecological circumstances, a high degree of complementarity is more likely to be achieved when agricultural development is (1) broadly based and involves small- and medium-sized farms, (2) market driven, (3) participatory and decentralized, and (4) driven by technological change that enhances factor productivity but does not degrade the resource base. Such growth can reduce food prices while increasing farm incomes; is employment intensive; and increases the effective demand for nonfood goods and services, particularly in small towns and market centers. By reducing poverty and promoting economic diversification in rural areas, it also relieves livelihood demands on the natural resource base.
THE FIVE I’S FOR AGRICULTURAL GROWTH
The requirements for broad-based agricultural development are reasonably well understood and should not be forgotten in the contemporary quest for environmental sustainability. Since they are so important, they are briefly reviewed here.
Back in the 1950s and 1960s, policymakers and agricultural development experts were primarily interested in growth, and the lessons that emerged from that experience can be summarized as the five I’s for agricultural growth.
Infrastructure, particularly good road and transport systems. Inputs. Efficient delivery systems for agricultural services, especially for modern farm inputs, agroprocessing, irrigation water, and credit. Institutions. Efficient, liberalized markets that provide farmers with ready access to domestic and international markets and effective public institutions to provide key services where these cannot be devolved to the private sector. Incentives. Conducive macro, trade, and sector policies that do not penalize agriculture.
EQUITY MODIFIERS: HOW AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CAN REDUCE POVERTY
In the 1970s and 1980s, policymakers and development experts began to focus on ways of using agricultural development to reduce poverty and food security as well as contribute to growth. The lessons that emerged from that era can be summed up in six “equity modifiers” to agricultural growth:
ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFIERS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
The new priority of environmental sustainability that has emerged in the 1990s does not negate the need for agriculture to continue to contribute to growth, poverty alleviation, and increased food security; it is just that agriculture is now required to accomplish all of these in ways that do not degrade the environment. In addition to the five I’s and the six equity modifiers (there are no short cuts here), eight environmental modifiers are now required for sustainable agricultural development. These modifiers have yet to be fully worked out and tested through development experience. In many ways the process is still at the research and design stage.
CONCLUSIONS
Past patterns of agricultural growth have sometimes harmed the environment and exacerbated poverty and food insecurity among rural people, even as agriculture has met national food needs and contributed to export earnings. But poverty and environmental degradation are not an inevitable outcome of agricultural growth. Rather, these negative effects reflect inappropriate economic incentives for managing modern inputs in intensive farming systems, insufficient investment in many heavily populated backward areas, inadequate social and poverty concerns, and political systems that are often biased against rural people. With appropriate government policies and investments, institutional development, and agricultural research, there is no reason why agricultural development cannot simultaneously contribute to growth, poverty alleviation, and environmental sustainability.
For more information, see Peter Hazell and Ernst Lutz, “Integrating Environmental and Sustainability Concerns into Rural Development Policies,” in Agriculture and the Environment: Perspectives on Sustainable Rural Development, ed. Ernst Lutz, with the assistance of Hans Binswanger, Peter Hazell, and Alexander McCalla (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1998). Peter Hazell is director of the Environment and Production Technology Division at the International Food Policy Research Institute. |
|
"A 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and the Environment” is an initiative of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) to develop a shared vision and a consensus for action on how to meet future world food needs while reducing poverty and protecting the environment. Through the 2020 Vision initiative, IFPRI is bringing together divergent schools of thought on these issues, generating research, and identifying recommendations. The 2020 Briefs present information on various aspects of the issues." |
|
|
TOP of the page
|