A Primer on Intellectual Property Rights and Agricultural Biotechnologyby Philip G. Pardey, Brian D. Wright, and Carol NottenburgIntellectual property refers to products of the mind. Inventions, computer programs, publications, videotapes, and music are all examples of intellectual property. Intellectual property rights afford a time-limited legal protection to artistic, scientific, technological, or economic products. Copyrights, trademarks, design patents, utility patents, plant patents, plant breeders' rights, and trade secret laws are some of the ways of protecting intellectual property rights. The type of intellectual property to be protected and the legal and administrative system of the country where the right is being sought affect the extent of rights, such as the scope of the protection and the geographical limits to and duration of the rights. In plant breeding, patents and plant breeders' rights have generally been the most important forms of intellectual property protection. As the biotechnological revolution unfolds, however, copyrights are becoming more important because the databases that hold information about plant genes can often be copyrighted. Such copyrights do not, however, affect trade in products developed using the protected information. U.S. state trade secret laws have been used to protect in-house breeding materials such as the inbred lines of maize used as parents of hybrids, but these laws do not protect against independent discovery or reverse engineering of products by their purchasers. Hence, patents afford stronger protection than trade secret law for innovation embodied in products. Trademarks are used for the protection of brand names of biotechnologies, such as Monsanto's Roundup ReadyJ technology or Aventis's Liberty7 and LibertyLink7 technologies. Trademarks only protect the names and other symbols denoting products or technologies, not the technologies themselves.
PATENTS While many member countries of the World Trade Organization are still in the process of implementing a protection system for plants, the United States and Europe have led the way in allowing utility patents for plants, particularly for transgenic plants. In 1985, the U.S. Patent Office Board of Appeals ruled that asexually and sexually propagated seeds, plants, and tissue culture could be protected by utility patents. More recently, the European Patent Office has held that transgenic methods and plants are not per se unpatentable.
PLANT BREEDERS' RIGHTS
CONTRACTUAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROPRIETARY TOOLS
There are also a number of genetic technologies that impose technical limits on farmers' use of seeds from their harvest to replant or to sell for replanting. The most common is production of hybrid crops that generally have a lower yield through loss of "hybrid vigor" if replanted. Modern alternatives include genetic use restriction technologies that confer sterility on replanted seeds 'popularly dubbed terminator technologies' and others that allow reproduction but prevent expression of proprietary traits until the plant is treated with a specific chemical activator.
|
|||
|
|